The importance of Network Monitoring Systems (NMS)

One of our open tickets on MidWest-IX is a member reporting slow speeds on their exchange port. After having them send us some data and a few e-mails back and forth we began looking at their switch port on the fabric.  Right away we noticed errors on the port. After a counter reset the errors were still incrementing

 19 runts  0 giants  1210 CRC  0 no buffer
 1329 input error  0 short frame  0 overrun  0 underrun  0 ignored

This led us to look at our LibreNMS data for this port.  A quick look shows on October 31st the port started seeing input errors.

By dilling down we are able to see exactly when this started happening

We now have responded to the customer to see if anything changed that day. Maybe a new switch, new optic, or software upgrade.  By having this data available in an NMS we were able to cut down on troubleshooting by a huge margin.  We now know when the issue started and are closer to the root cause of this.  Without this data, we would be spending more time trying to diagnose and track down issues.

---
MTIN Family of Sites
https://indycolo.net
https://j2sw.com
https://startawisp.info

IgniteNet Metrolinq 60 new Firmware

https://support.ignitenet.com/portal/kb/articles/firmware-downloads-metrolinq-2-5

  • New Feature: Added 12 client support for 60GHz radio
  • New Feature: Added MCS12 support for 60GHz radio
  • New Feature: Added STP control
  • New Feature: Added Jumbo frame support for 5GHz radio (up to 7912)
  • New Feature: Added support for RSTP passthrough
  • New Feature: Added L2 and L3 MTU control options
  • Improved:RSSI (signal level) representation for 60GHz
  • Improved: traffic shaping ruleset
  • Improved: UI (added L2, L3 mtu to dashboard)
  • Improved: failover mechanism with high system load
  • Fixed: mDNS (GUI issues)
  • Fixed: interfaces not being added to bridge
  • Fixed: 60 GHz radio scan problem
  • Fixed: IGMP snooping
  • Fixed: missing stations list stats gathering
  • Fixed: SSID validation issue
  • Fixed: config restoration when management vlan is used

---
MTIN Family of Sites
https://indycolo.net
https://j2sw.com
https://startawisp.info

Installer Tool: Magnespot

The MagneSpot XR1000 Kit is an intelligent reference point locator that gives users complete confidence before drilling, cutting, or any other task you may previously had to do blindly. Operating the XR1000 is simple! Just place the XR1000T Transmitter exactly on the point you need to find. On the other side of the wall, ceiling, or floor, the XR1000R Receiver will indicate to you which direction to move using its four red LED arrows. When you are perfectly lined up with the Transmitter, all 4 Arrows illuminate. The XR1000 is accurate up to 1/2″ & works at distances up to 3 to 4 feet away! There are 8/32″ threads on the bottom of the transmitter, making it compatible w/Labor Saving Devices Creep-Zip or Klein Tools fiberglass rods & others w/8/32″ threads to help in hard to reach areas. Both Transmitter & Receiver are sporting the MagneSpot red logo. For Low or High votage: Voice/Data/Video/Security/Power, CATV, CCTV, MATV (Master Antenna) & SAT TV (Satellite Dishes) etc!

---
MTIN Family of Sites
https://indycolo.net
https://j2sw.com
https://startawisp.info

PTP 550 continuation

In a previous post, I mentioned a 5-mile link using Cambium PTP550s and why frequency matters. Today we enabled the second radio and have some results from that.  First, let us talk about some of the parameters.

As you can see from our frequency scan we have a very noisy frequency.  Without DFS we have very few open channels.  Due to this, the results you will see later are not optimal.  The limiting factor is the noise on the band.

After much channel selection, this is what we ended up with. As you can see we are just running a 40mhz and a 20mhz channel.  This is because the band is so noisy.

As a result of the frequency, this is what we have ended up with for quality and capacity. The second radio is less than optimal, but it is passing solid data.

So what do speed tests look like across the link?

Single Radio Speedtest

Using channel bonding

Some of you may still be asking, it should be more. If you have noticed the noisy frequency band has been the greatest factor on this link.  In the quality and capacity screenshot, you will notice the 2nd radio only has a 45% capacity.  This is due to channel selection. If we could get better channels this would improve the link.

Wo what is the answer? Better backhaul antennas are upgrade number 1.  Currently, we are using UBNT 2 foot dishes, which were chosen due to the gain needed on this link. Secondly, when DFS is certified for these radios we will have more channels available.  The frequency scan shows the DFS channels are less noisy in this area, which will increase throughput.

Just for giggles, we had the tech on-site run a speedtest.  This was through a wireless router with a 100 meg ethernet port plugged into the local router.

 

---
MTIN Family of Sites
https://indycolo.net
https://j2sw.com
https://startawisp.info

Cambium cnPilot e430w 802.11ac first look

Some photos of the Cambium cnPilot e430w 802.11ac wave 2 dual-band wi-fi wall plate access point.

Some Features
-802.11AC Wave 2
-2×2 MU-MIMO streams.
-Max Data Rates 1.3 Gbps. 867 Mbps (5 GHz), 400 Mbps (2.4 MHz)
-16 SSIDs across 2 radios

Link to more info

---
MTIN Family of Sites
https://indycolo.net
https://j2sw.com
https://startawisp.info

WISP Teamwork to make signals better

This post is a huge shout out to Tasos Alexiou from RF Elements.  This story started out at WISPAPALOOZA Vegas this year.  I had a few clients who have been fighting noise issues. While working the Cambium booth we would go over the benefits of ePMP for noise mitigation.  This would naturally lead to an antenna discussion. You can’t have an antenna discussion without mentioning RF Elements and their horn design.  As with anything, clients are skeptical to things outside the conventional way of doing things.  It’s not that the client is closed minded, but change becomes a little harder when revenue and cash outlay are involved.  I am a very visual guy so I walked several of these clients over to the RF Elements booth so they could see the product and have it explained by the folks themselves.

These clients were getting it, but I could tell they were a little hesitant to make the leap.  This is where the teamwork of the story really comes into play.  Tasos could sense the same thing I was seeing, and came up with a plan.  In the shipment of their gear to Vegas, they had some extra gear.  After some negotiation, he told us to stop by after the show and he would see what he could do to get some gear in the hands of both of these clients.  After the show, I was able to send both of these clients home with some 30 and 45-degree horns.   Not only that, but these clients were able to talk about their specific situations, draw diagrams, and get a great understanding of how to get the best fit out of the equipment.

I am happy to say we have the first results from these horns.  Mohave Broadband was able to put up a 30-degree horn in an area where they were having clients with signal and interference issues. By adjusting their 90/120 sectors, which even have beamforming,  they were able to have the horn fit in their most troublesome area.  Some of the troubles were customers who could not connect on a certain frequency very well, but others could.  If the frequencies were changed the good customers became bad and vice versa.  Once the horn was in place we noticed a couple of things.

The first was customers in the 30-degree beam of the horn were able to connect at good signals and data rates. These were customers who were pointed right at the sectors before, not ones on the fringes.

Secondly, due to the nature of the horn we were able to select from more channels due to the lack of sidelobes from the horns.

Customer links on the AP.

We could go on and on how the ePMP 2000 APs with their noise filtering, and the “clean” pattern of the horn make the difference but that is not the focus of the article.  The focus is how many separate pieces of the WISP community came together to help.  From WISPA putting on the show to the willingness of Tasos and RF elements to help these customers, and the ability to sit down and draw out diagrams and antenna placement to get the best place to place antennas. For those of you who don’t attend tradeshows, this is one of the success stories with a few more to come on this blog.


MTIN Family of Sites
https://j2sw.com
https://indycolo.net
https://mtin.net
https://startawisp.info

---
MTIN Family of Sites
https://indycolo.net
https://j2sw.com
https://startawisp.info

Frequency does matter

Recently we installed a PTP 550 link for a client.  This is a connectorized version with 2-foot dishes on it for a four-mile link.  Overkill you say, but the idea is the dishes make up the gain and not transmitter power.  A much cleaner signal can be achieved which falls within the FCC guidelines for total EIRP.

So let’s get to it.  Our first image is out path.  This link had clear line of sight from a 150-foot foot water tower to a 240-foot tower.

Google Earth Path

The 240 Foot tower

150 Foot water tower

After getting out of the cold we let things burn in for a few days. This is what an initial spectrum analysis looked like.

Radio Frequency set on 5820 mhz

Radio Frequency set on 5200mhz

As you can see the RSSI was within 2 DB, which isn’t terrible.  However, due to interference, the MCS rates are markedly different, which is what results in the big differences in speed.  Please note this is only with one radio enabled and on a 20mhz channel.  We fully expect bigger speeds once we up channel sizes and enable the second radio.

---
MTIN Family of Sites
https://indycolo.net
https://j2sw.com
https://startawisp.info